Sunday 19 February 2017

Investor perception of today's Scots

Unaccustomed to writing blogs, I approach this exercise nervously. But, on balance, it seems a good idea to get things off your chest and air the sometimes troublesome thoughts that circle in the mind. Maybe it will help, so here goes........

The United Kingdom has been a beacon of justice, democracy and fairness for centuries. A stable country and viewed as one of opportunity, borne out by the vast numbers of international citizens who have chosen to make Britain their home. Ours is a country where a working class lad from Brixton, John Major, was able to become Prime Minister, and a minister's son from Kirkcaldy, Gordon Brown, also made it to the same position. It is truly a place of opportunity where a person can achieve virtually anything their personal capabilities will allow. It is true that those with the more robust family structures around them will find that success more easy to achieve but that might be said of any country in the world. There will always be work needed to improve  social mobility and to break cycles of deprivation but if there is a place on earth where this is recognised and fought for, it is surely the United Kingdom!

In that light, how might we Scots be viewed by international investors and business partners when they see a noisy element of our countrymen decrying our way of life? Politically, our image has become one of angry men and women, eternally aggrieved and engaged in aggressive, threatening rhetoric. That aggression and those threats are directed towards the structures of the United Kingdom. The very structures that have made Britain the stable and desirable place it is. We appear angry and aggressive towards a society and way of life that is opportunity laden and as safe as possible in the increasingly fragile geopolitical situation that is the 21st century.

Scotland's political representatives at Westminster by and large see their role as being to oppose, object and spoil. They do not give an impression of positivity. They do not give an impression of acting collaboratively with any intent to improve matters for any citizens, never mind their own constituents. They give an impression of being against anything and everything that might be promoted by any party, other than the Scottish National Party.

Scotland's political representation - angry, aggressive, aggrieved (faux)



So if we can't ever be seen to agree or collaborate with good people in our own United Kingdom, how might third parties view us from outside? If looking for a business partner, do you want one who is eternally aggrieved, aggressive and threatening to its existing partners? Particularly when those partners are amongst the fairest, most open, honest and decent people possible? If a prospective business partner is shown to be spiteful, unwilling to act collaboratively and positively with, effectively, their own people, why on earth would you get involved with them? If that is how they relate to their closest associates, how could you trust them to deal with you any differently?

I genuinely worry about Scotland. Our economy is lagging that of England, where growth is being achieved. I travelled to London and Manchester last week and was taken with the number of tower cranes there were in and around the city centres. Considerably more activity, it felt to me, than in my home territory of Edinburgh. Might that be because we are open to being interpreted as bad business partners?

I was meeting clients who develop student accommodation buildings. We had done some work together in Scotland historically but they have decided not to do any more here for now. We laughed as one of their key figures remarked "you're all angry and mad up there". It was said in semi-jest and whilst we laughed, the reality was that here was a business who didn't think Scotland a good place to invest at the moment. The thought of the income our business had planned from projects they have since pulled back from, now lost, wasn't so funny.

We are fortunate because we are being engaged by this client on England based projects. So a bit more travelling for us, but welcome workload to help pay people's mortgages nonetheless. Other Scots businesses might not be as fortunate as us.

I can't help but feel our experience is part of a much wider problem though. The economic picture in Scotland has lagged rUK for the past few years. That lag has existed since the run up to the 2014 referendum and shows no real sign of improving. The SNP now cling to the more recent circumstance of the Brexit vote, blaming that for our economic struggles. But it's been happening for longer than that. The Brexit excuse is all the more depressing as it illustrates an abject failure to accept or interrogate the reality of our situation. Rather than do that, our political representatives resort to the angry, threatening rhetoric and push that agenda of grievance. I find it difficult to understand how that is meant to help our economic fortunes improve.

Scots, like our countrymen throughout the UK, are creative and resourceful. We've made wealth for ourselves, our people and our business partners across the centuries. We did that by working hard and collaboratively such that good people wanted to trade and do business with us. We are though in danger of hiding these qualities from potential investors who look in from the outside and might see our politics as reflective of the people we are now. I think we have grounds to be worried.








22 comments:

  1. You have hit the nail firmly on the head.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One word: Brexit. It has changed everything about the way the UK is perceived around the world. We are a beacon right enough, but no longer for anything positive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a load of nonsense. Have you read the above? The problems besetting Scotland started way before Brexit. Blaming Brexit is to take the easy way out of accepting the TRUE nature of our problems. The SNP were only too happy to take us out of the eu in 2014.
      It is the SNP's politics of grievance and confrontation that has lead to a lack of investors in Scotland and blaming Brexit is an attempt to disguise the SNP's total ineptitude of governing Scotland.
      When we do finally leave the eu there will be no shortage of countries willing to sign trade agreements with us and the eu countries we trade with will want that to continue because after all we are their biggest export market. Scotland's problems are DEEPER and have been going LONGER than Brexit and to suggest anything else is burying your head in the sand.

      Delete
    2. We have a large element of our population who won't read anything that is not in accordance with the prescribed world view handed down by the snp leadership. It's quite depressing. I have a sense that Brexit will be a success and historians will look back and view it as a smart move. We can only hope that enough Scots can remain awake and aware that the UK is the best vehicle for us to share in that success.

      Delete
  3. An absolutely first class account. One of the best arguments I've heard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. With a bit of luck, the unionists can inflict a second, crushing defeat on the separatists next year, allowing us all to finally move on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But how will that help Scotland given that the constitutional question continues to divide so closely according to polls

      Delete
  5. I agree, because hearsay and anecdotal evidence are really good ways to decide your country's constitutional future.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You give a glimpse into Scotland today. The anger, aggression and grievance you describe are matched by a 'Rab C Nesbit' mentality. It might seem hilariously funny, but when it becomes the ethos of a solid 35% of the population, when educational standards as measured internationally are falling, and our government gains extra powers without using them, while stirring up the latest 'Westminster' atrocities to fuel their independence-trumps-all agenda, the prospects are bleak.

    ReplyDelete
  7. But then if I was a Scottish MP in the Commons I might have some justifiable feelings about the snarky responses from the Govt benches every time I raise a question about a whole variety of issues on behalf of my constituents and get the mono-response "but Scotland voted against leaving the UK in 2014" . Did you ever consider that maybe the creaky democratic structures of UK governance contribute to this psychology on both sides ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Congratulations on a well thought out and presented commentary on the current state of play. I have a small business which I have now registered in England purely because of the actions of this SNP government who f the truth be told are not the first bit interested in the EU, their sole being that of independence at any cost.

    ReplyDelete
  9. SNP are right to take Scotland out of the UK so that they may learn to stand on their own two feet instead of free riding on the Barnett Formula. The scots would be invigorated and the rest of the UK would be financially better off. So you have the support of many in the UK for your ambitions even though we may have to pay a WTO agreed tariff on our whisky in future.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Surely it shows the world that Great Britain is open for business and is not prepared to remain in the corrupt and moribund European experiment?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great to hear a voice from Scotland, other than the voice of SNP. While I am sure it is unfair to equate the Scottish people with the SNP, in reality it is difficult to do otherwise. I know Brexit is a big issue right now, but would SNP have been all peace and love if it had been Brexin? I doubt it. I am sure they would have found something else to justify independence. I believe as long as SNP has the majority in Westminster or in Scotland, independence will be a threat, although they may not succeed in realising it, although it is not so much of a majority now, but almost a case of single party governance.
    Do you think Devolution was brought to Scotland for genuinely good reasons, or was it just a clever design by Labour to ensure its stronghold in Scotland, which has backfired on them? Do you think Devolution has been good for Scotland regardless of how it came about?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Currently in India for six weeks on annual trip to learn and write, Indians astonished by naivety of wanting to go it alone with population of 5.5 million, same population of Ahmedabad in which we are right now. Scots gave so much to the world and in particular Indian subcontinent but now whine and make out they are oppressed. Arrant nonsense with grievance negative culture that repels others. Bravo this blog speaking out.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Odd that the author, rather than defend Scotland's reputation, should acquiesce to the potential investor's assertions (which were in very poor taste).

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good afternoon Richard. Were I unable to persuade our client that not all Scots behave in the manner of our political elite, they would not continue to engage the services of our business!

    I wrote this blog in the hope people may reflect on, and perhaps call for modification in the way our representatives present themselves. I am suffering from, and reporting on, the unfortunate reality of current perception. That perception really does matter and I guess that is the point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, so after I'd untangled the triple-negative in your first paragraph, I get that what your saying is that the money your English client brings to you is personally more important to you than political or cultural considerations. Fair enough. We've all got to put food on the table in the short term.

      But, and it's a big but, are not rhetorical displays of "anger" the stuff of legislative chambers worldwide? Why should such rhetoric in the mouths of Scottish politicians be especially distasteful to your client? It sounds like your client is a bit of a bigot, ready to use any excuse to exercise his or her anti-Scottish confirmation bias. Only forelock-tugging compliance with the dominant English political culture in these islands will satisfy their criteria for investment in Scotland. Is it a clause in their contracts?

      Perhaps, notwithstanding your sort-term needs for business continuity, you should ask yourself whether doing business with bigots is, in the medium to long term, compatible with your own dignity.

      Delete
    2. It is interesting Richard that you choose not to reflect on whether there might actually be a point in what I had to say. Rather, you immediately prefer an attack on the character of individuals you have not met. You follow that with a modest personal sleight for my benefit. Fair enough though, that is your prerogative. Thanks for reading in the first place and have a pleasant evening.

      Delete
  15. Looks like you have a prima-facie case against your client under the Equality Act 2010 which explicitly outlaws organisations having a particular policy or way of working that puts people of a particular racial or national group at a disadvantage.

    Additionally, the phrase used by your client is a clear example of a racially aggravated slur and may also constitute a not only a breach of the peace under Scots Law, but also is a statutory hate crime under The Offences (Aggravation by Prejudice) (Scotland) Act 2009.

    You really must stand up against anti-Scottish prejudice like that.
    "Because, if you tolerate this, your children will be next"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose if this was a case of people being anti-Scottish, they wouldn't employ the services of my business. Equally, this is not something I would take offence at, still having that great Scots attribute - the ability to laugh at ourselves!

      Investors will make choices based of the likelihood of making a return and the ease with which they perceive transactions might take place. Political stability also likely to influence, particularly if there are questions over constitutional matters, currency and tax regimes etc. Thank you for reading.

      Delete
  16. Love you! So well said...fresh air at last!!! Ta!

    ReplyDelete